Skip to main content

Representation of taxation

Regular readers of this space may recall that I'm partial to tax-related infoviz. So imagine my excitement in coming across this beaut from the Washington Post:

How the fight over tax breaks affects your bottom line

Here in the US, the Bush tax cuts are set to expire soon, and the government has several possible courses of action. This graphic interactively depicts three scenarios, and the impact that each would have on the federal budget as well as the taxpayers'.

Why it's great:
  • Clean, spare, streamlined. The options are clearly delineated (via tabs) and the change in outcomes is evident and easy to understand.
  • Needless details about taxpayer cohorts (homeownership, filing status, that sort of thing) are wisely avoided; the captions on the vertical axis provide the necessary macro context.
  • The attractive tan-to-red color scheme/progression is subtle yet distinct; though the colors hang together to keep the graphic unified, each of the seven subsets is quite distinct.
Putting on my critic's hat, I'd also point out some stuff that's a bit confusing:

Most often with line charts, the x-axis is a timeline. So it was hard for me not to automatically interpret the vertical gray dividing lines as year markers and see the horizontal lines as temporal indicators.

But this graphic is actually a matrix masquerading as a line chart. In truth, the format is column-centered; rolling over each label at bottom brings up the relevant pop-up and percentage figures... So if the labels are where the real action is, why put them at the bottom?

Alternatively, I imagined separating the columns from one another, with a little white space between. That would lessen the momentum and power of the horizontal lines.

Also, I have a personal thing about bubble charts - it's hard to compare the relative size of circles. (Take, for instance, the difference between the circles for $583 and $1016; does the lower one really look like only 60% of the one above?) Comparing rectangles is much easier, according to the reports I've seen.

In the scheme of things, though, these are minor matters. Congrats to the WaPo for this nice piece of infoviz.


Popular posts from this blog

Quality dataviz about quality-of-life issues

To accompany its Better Life Initiative, OECD (the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) has put up a handsome, carefully constructed set of interactive data graphics called the Better Life Index:
There is more to life than the cold numbers of GDP and economic statistics – this Index allows you to compare well-being across countries, based on 11 topics the OECD has identified as essential, in the areas of material living conditions and quality of life. Each country is represented by a multicolored flower with 11 petals (OK, yes, potentially cheesy). The length of each petal represents the country's score in a given area; the width of the petal indicates the importance the user has assigned to that particular aspect. Drilling down into the details is easy to do; in fact, if you've a mind to do your own visualizations of this info, the underlying index data can be downloaded in spreadsheet format.

Kudos to Moritz Stefaner, Jonas Leist and Timm Kekeritz (for Raure…

Cool Map: Emissions worldwide

From the Center for Public Integrity comes this interactive map showing greenhouse gas emissions from many of the world's largest economies.

Lots of data is packed into this simple interface, and the map itself is blessedly clear.

Note, though, that when it comes to infoviz issues, even these pros needed a do-over. Check out the message in the lower left corner. In an earlier version they made the common mistake of comparing circles based on radius, instead of by area. It's to their credit that not only did they fix the mistake, but they also owned up to it and made the change. The larger problem, though, is that distinguishing the relative size of circles is not easy for the average viewer; rectangles are clearer, and would probably have made this cool map even stronger.

Note also that stats are from 2005. Since then there's been substantial economic growth in China (for example), so the current numbers are likely to be even higher than what's shown here.

Differing Vie…

What Not to Do with Infographics, now in handy infographic form

From, a cautionary illustration that expresses exactly what I hate about so very many infographics. It dumbs down information under the guise of making you smarter.

Browse more infographics.