Life expectancy and health expenditures - a Synoptical Charts original



In selecting my international sample, I decided to examine the top 5 countries in each of four categories: 

  • Longest life expectancy (longest)
  • Lowest infant mortality (least)
  • Highest health care expenditure per capita
  • Greatest prevalence of physicians

My source for these stats was the invaluable Nationmaster.com. (Note:  As a proxy for Hong Kong and Macau, I've used China's expenditure figure, since they've both been under Chinese rule for the last decade.)

Given where the two dimensions of this graph ultimately lead, I've nicknamed it "Death and Taxes (Sorta)."

Comments

  1. MarsosudiroSeptember 23, 2009 at 11:42 AM

    Awesome graph for comparing the two variables! If the data is real, the graph is a very fast and clear way of showing (among other things) the non-perfect correlation between spending and life expectancy, along with a list of which countries are (perhaps surprisingly) tops in life expectancy (by the chart) and other measure (by getting included on the chart).

    That said, I wonder about the Nationmaster data on per-capita expenditures. Singapore spending less than $1k per capita? Nationmaster has gotta be kidding me. Is the per-capita expenditure for ALL spending (personal plus corporate plus government plus whomever else), or just some subset?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Carrie WeinerSeptember 24, 2009 at 11:39 AM

    Thanks for the kind words. Glad you like the graph.

    Here's the definition of "expenditure" in this case, per Nationmaster:

    Total health expenditure is the sum of public and private health expenditures as a ratio of total population. It covers the provision of health services (preventive and curative), family planning activities, nutrition activities, and emergency aid designated for health but does not include provision of water and sanitation. Data are in current U.S. dollars.

    SOURCE: World Development Indicators database

    Looks like I may have inadvertently omitted Denmark, however; will update the chart and repost with that info.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carrie WeinerSeptember 24, 2009 at 6:46 PM

    See updated version. Also, as it turns out, Denmark does not need to be listed here.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I want to be Jorge Camoes when I grow up.

Portuguese infoviz enthusiast Jorge Camoes has spent the last year and a half writing informed, insightful blog posts on the field, complete with examples and citations. To his credit, he approaches everything -- even the revered work of Edward Tufte and Stephen Few -- with loving skepticism. I'm gratified, too, that he seems to agree with me on one central point: Snazzy tools alone don't get you good data visualization. It all comes down to putting serious thought into the project before you plot the first data point. In future posts we'll discuss more of Jorge's ideas. Bem feito, o Sr. Camoes!
Read more

Hype and backlash:
visualizing pop culture trends

Image
Back in 2005, the astute pop-culture chronicler Adam Sternbergh pointed out that a person's opinion of any given entertainment product depends largely on how long they've been aware of it — that is, where the product sits on the sine-wave timeline of public expectations (aka buzz). His findings, in chart form: "Welcome to the undulating curve of shifting expectations—the Heisenbergian principle by which hype determines how much you enjoy a given pop-culture phenomenon. The first-wave audience is pleasantly surprised, but the second-wavers feel let down; then the third wave finds it’s not as bad as they’ve heard—and they’re all watching the exact same show." Almost five years later, this pattern describes just about all our collective experiences. Sports fans, how much sweeter was it to watch the New Orleans Saints come out of nowhere to win the NFC championship than to have seen the Minnesota Vikings do it for the umpteenth time? As for politics, consider the poll
Read more

Critique: NYT unemployment graphics

Image
To illustrate the horrible unemployment numbers announced today ( "employers in the United States have shed about 3.6 million jobs since December 2007" ), the New York Times presents a series of graphics : 1 ) We have a perfectly nice bar chart here: clear, legible, professionally done, all that. This chart tells us two (2) things: what month it is and how many jobs were lost. Surely there is additional info about this two-year stretch that would add depth and meaning (and potentially even yield an epiphany or two!). One suggestion: The story says, "Manufacturers eliminated 207,000 jobs, more than in any year since 1982. The construction industry eliminated 111,000 jobs. And retailers, who were wrapping up their worst holiday shopping season in years, eliminated 45,000 jobs." Segmenting each bar by color to represent the various sectors would show at a glance where the biggest losses were coming from. 2) Again, a perfectly nice fever chart. (I don't mean to min
Read more