Skip to main content

Ask and ye shall receive: more on where the stimulus money will go

Two days ago, I wrote:
I'm hoping that someone at ProPublica will soon update [a treemap of the House's stimulus bill], including a treemap of the bill's Senate version and providing graphics that compare 1) the proposed dollar amounts, 2) sector spending and 3) the timetables.
Apparently I'm not the only one who thought this would be a good idea, because now Shovelwatch.org presents a treemap of the Senate bill — and, even better, a bar chart comparing the two versions. ProPublica has a brief text item on the contrasts, but the chart is a far superior means of expressing them. Here's why:
  • It's interactive, so you can choose exactly what you which aspects of the data you want to see and exactly how you want to see them (by average, by total, by whose bill they come from). Sometimes interactivity is like lipstick on a pig (ahem) — a last-ditch gimmick to save a bad chart — but here it's appropriate and meaningful.

  • You can choose what you want on the X axis: allocation of monies by general category (e.g. aid to states, tax cuts, energy) or by individual program (e.g. railroads, Medicaid, highways, school construction).

  • You can view aggregates charted by categories' total costs or average per-program cost.

  • Those X-axis items can be sorted alphabetically (and reverse-alphabetically!) and in order of magnitude.

  • You can see columns for House provisions only, Senate provisions only, or both simultaneously for instant contrast.

  • Hovering your cursor over each bar on the chart triggers a pop-up box telling you what the category is, whose plan it comes from, how many programs comprise that category and either the category total or average per-program cost.
Bravo, Shovelwatch, and thank you. Exemplary work.

Next up, I hope (are you listening out there, viz whizzes?): a visualization of the final version soon to be signed by the President. Then we can all start griping knowledgeably and in earnest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recommended: a new review "zoo"

"A Tour Through the Visualization Zoo" is a fantastic introduction to some attractive and sophisticated new visualization formats. The article and illos were put together by Stanford's Jeffrey Heer, Michael Bostock, and Vadim Ogievetsky. Heer is an HCI/visualization genius whose journal articles I've been following with interest; Bostock is the whiz behind the D3 archive of javascript code for visualization.

Run, don't walk. It's great.

Blast from the past: a 1974 data treatise by Edward Tufte

Back in 1974, Yale poli-sci professor Edward Tufte published a slim volume called Data Analysis for Politics and Policy (Prentice-Hall, $3.95). The book in its entirety is available for free download (PDFs) at Tufte's website, accompanied by a contemporary review from the Journal of the American Statistical Association. More than 30 years later, the review amuses me with its restrained praise of the perspective that would eventually make Tufte a Major Figure (and a minor fortune):
Tufte puts residual plots to good use to gain understanding of a data set, and he shows how finding outliers gives the analyst hints about the inadequacy of a statistical model... The discussion of graphical techniques in general is quite good... A brief but compelling discussion of the "value of data as evidence," with regard to the interpretation of nonrandom samples, is presented. If you happen to have a spare 48MB lying about, DAPP's worth a download.

[via Sofa Papa]